The Fairey Rotodyne
The idea of a convertiplane is not new. A combination of a helicopter and a fixed-wing aircraft has been tried several times. However, such a convertiplane not only combines the advantages of both separate types, but also the disadvantages like higher costs, lower speed and range and less capacity! In spite of this a British aircraft manufacturer almost succeeded to make this formula economical feasible.
However, the project failed for political reasons and, most likely, also because of poor company management. The plane involved is the Rotodyne of the late fifties/early sixties, a design from Fairey Aviation Ltd.
How it started…
By 1953, the remaining second Gyrodyne was extensively rebuilt. It was fitted with a two-stage compressor from a Rolls Royce Merlin providing compressed air for the rotor-tip drives. Fuel-injection at the tips provided further rotor thrust. In fact the Austrian engineer Friedrich von Doblhoff had pioneered on this type of propulsion during the Second World War with the experimental WNF 342 helicopter and it was no coincidence that one of von Doblhoff’s development engineers, Dipl. Ing. August Stepan, was on Fairey’s payroll! Further, the Jet-Gyrodyne as this development was called featured not one but two shaft-driven propellers on the wing stubs. Fitted with the military serial number XD749, it made its first flight in January 1954. It was later for administrative reasons re-serialed as XJ389. By September 1956 it had made 190 transition landings and 140 autorotation landings. The flight experiences gained with the Jet-Gyrodyne were very important for the later Rotodyne! For those who are interested: the Jet-Gyrodyne is presently on display in the RAF Aerospace Museum at Cosford, UK.
Although the Rotodyne prototype was built under a military contract, Fairey also aimed at the civil market. After negotiations with various airline companies options were booked by B.E.A. for six final production aircraft followed by additional options by the U.S. New York Airways with a letter of intend for five with option for ten further machines and the Canadian Okanagan Airways with a letter of intend for one plus options for two more. Many other airline companies also showed a strong interest in the Rotodyne. Fairey had also contracted the U.S. Kaman Aircraft Corporation for future license construction. Further the Ministry of Supply had placed an option for 20 Rotodyne Z production models for the Royal Air Force. The Rotodyne Z production model was planned with more powerful Rolls Royce Tyne turboprops of 5250 shaft hp each and an increased wingspan. In this form, the Rotodyne could transport 50 to 65 passengers in the civil version and up to 70 armed soldiers in the military version. B.E A. had already planned a direct flight line from London Central to the city of Amsterdam! Also the Dutch naval air service MLD (Marine Luchtvaartdienst) had shown interest in the Rotodyne for operational use in New Guinea, although contacts were never official. Shortly after the visit of the Rotodyne to the Paris Airshow at Le Bourget it was demonstrated to NATO officers at Versailles.
The sad end…
The Rotodyne in its original prototype form had one disadvantage: it produced in helicopter mode an enormous amount of noise. People witnessing helicopter take offs and landings described it as the sound of a hundred hard working locomotives! For military use, this might have been acceptable, but for civil use from densely populated city centers definitely not. Fairey had already started to experiment with various types of sound mufflers for the jet-drives, but with limited success only. To solve this problem, Fairey wanted from the British government an extra financial guarantee for the development of an effective muffler. Unfortunately the request for this came at a political very inconvenient moment. At the late fifties/beginning of the sixties, the Tory government had decided to make major cuts in the military budgets and that meant no money was made available. This eventually resulted in the cancellation of the Ministry of Supply order. Although this was a major set back for Fairey, there still was a fair chance for the Rotodyne being produced in series.
Worse was the fact that Westland had meanwhile taken over Fairey Aviation Ltd. Westland also had a big transport and passenger helicopter in development (the Westland Westminster). Westland had also taken over Bristol Aeroplane Company who was building at that time the Belvedere twin-engine transport helicopter for the R.A.F.
Poor management during the final merging of these companies within Westland and wrongly chosen priorities were retrospectively most likely the main reasons why all work on the production Rotodyne Z never materialized. Westland was unable (or unwilling) to give its costumers which had already placed orders and options a guarantee for a timely supply after the initial Ministry of Supply was order canceled and it did not come as a great surprise when B.E.A., New York Airways and Okanegan withdraw their orders. The Rotodyne was officially canceled in February 1962…
Post-scriptum…
Retrospectively, we can only say the aircraft industry of the United Kingdom missed an unique opportunity!!
| Technical details: | Rotodyne Y | Rotodyne Z |
| Engine: | 2 Napier Eland H.E1-3 2 Rolls Royce Tyne | |
| Engine output: | 3000 shaft hp each | 5250 shaft hp each |
| Wingspan: | 14.17 m | 17.22 m |
| Length: | 17.88 m | 19.67 m |
| Height: | 6.76 m | 7.06 m |
| Rotor diameter: | 27.43 m | 31.72 m |
| All-up weight: | 14,968 kg | 22.700 kg |
| Maximum speed: | 307 km/h | >320 km/h |
| Range: | max. 724 km | 1180 km |
| Accommodation: | 40 passengers | max. 70 passengers |
How the Rotodyne would score today:
It is interesting to compare the Rotodyne Z capabilities and performances with its modern ‘counterparts’ the Boeing-Vertol Chinook and the Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey.
|
Fairey Rotodyne Z |
Boeing Helicopters CH-47D Chinook |
Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey |
|
|
Engine power |
2 x 5250 hp |
2 x 4378 hp |
2 x 6150 hp |
|
All-up weight |
22,700 kg |
24,494 kg |
23,000 kg |
|
Max. speed |
320+ km/h |
298 km/h |
550 km/h |
|
Range |
1180 km |
1190 km |
3892 km |
|
Accommodation (military) |
70 passengers |
45 passengers |
24 passengers |
As we may conclude from the figures in the table, the final production Rotodyne Z would have been definitely competitive if pursued by Westland. And that applies both to military and civil market. It is particularly surprising to see that the Rotodyne from more than 35 years ago has a much larger passenger capacity than both Chinook and Osprey of today at roughly the same weight! Of course the Osprey is far superior in speed and range, but it has only a third of the passenger capacity of the Rotodyne and the tilt-wing mechanism is much more complicated and maintenance-unfriendly than the compressed-air system of the Rotodyne. As known, it took a very long ‘gestation’ period before the Osprey was fully operational at U.S. Marine forces!
Tips for the model builders:
Nico Braas
References:
Nico Braas, De Fairey Rotodyne, Luchtvaartkennis Vol.37, June 1988
Patrick McDonnell, Requiem for the Rotodyne, Aeroplane Monthly, Jan. 2000
H.A. Taylor, Fairey aircraft since 1915, Putnam-London (1974)





[...] public links >> fairey The Fairey Rotodyne Saved by skaterdude1996 on Sat 25-10-2008 Tempe’s Twelve Monkeys? Saved by ESAact on Fri [...]