Author Topic: F-111  (Read 11982 times)

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2010, 04:38:14 PM »
And... anther one...

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2010, 07:45:58 PM »
Flying Dutchman

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2010, 09:06:06 PM »
Completed for now  :-roll

Offline Sall

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4641
  • Build what YOU want,the way YOU want to,and above all-have fun!
    • View Profile
Re: F-111
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2010, 09:13:04 PM »
 :-clap :-clap :-clap :-clap

dragan_mig31

  • Guest
Re: F-111
« Reply #19 on: December 23, 2010, 01:03:51 AM »
great work.I have a 1:72 esci f-111a built years ago,If I find some spare decals for a vietnam bird I may rebuild it one day.

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #20 on: December 23, 2010, 07:53:28 AM »
Thanky friends :) Dragan, as I know Two Bobs make decals for this but... you are also decal manufacturer :))

Letipapa

  • Guest
Re: F-111
« Reply #21 on: December 25, 2010, 01:35:26 AM »
Woooow! Respectful machine, and wonderful profiles. :-obey :-obey :-obey :-salut

May be I am wrong, but shouldn't the tail number on the last one be 60016 instead of 60018 (because you have 0016 at the and of the file name) :-think

 :-wave

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #22 on: December 25, 2010, 07:07:27 AM »
Oooopppss... you are right about number :(

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #23 on: February 08, 2014, 01:43:24 PM »
Update after few years :))

Offline Tweety

  • Beginner
  • *
  • Posts: 175
    • View Profile
Re: F-111
« Reply #24 on: February 08, 2014, 10:19:12 PM »
And from me again  :-jump :-jump :-jump :-jump :-jump :-jump :-jump :-obey :-obey :-obey :-obey :-flo :-flo :-flo

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2014, 10:42:57 PM »
Thanks :))

Offline Nico Braas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 959
    • View Profile
Re: F-111
« Reply #26 on: February 09, 2014, 12:51:30 PM »
F-111 was an impressive and LARGE machine. Although it was useless as a fighter; it was an excellent bomber!
Time for a photo update!! I have set all images at 1000 pixels wide to give a full screen.

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2014, 12:54:49 PM »
I like this machine, very interesting one :) Thank you for image update ;)

Offline Nico Braas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 959
    • View Profile
Re: F-111
« Reply #28 on: February 09, 2014, 12:55:19 PM »
Second and, for the time being, last set of F-111 images

Offline No.1

  • Administrator and Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22772
  • Owner: www.letletlet-warplanes.com
    • View Profile
    • LetLetLet - Warplanes
Re: F-111
« Reply #29 on: February 09, 2014, 12:55:45 PM »
:-ok