LetLetLet ~ Warplanes

Let Let Let - Warplanes => Warplane Art => Topic started by: No.1 on October 06, 2009, 10:00:21 PM

Title: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on October 06, 2009, 10:00:21 PM
Hi  :-wave

just start this big machine, this is special order and free lance project  ;)

Cheers :))
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Letipapa on October 07, 2009, 12:13:57 AM
Aaaahhh! The great one! :-ok :-wave
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on October 07, 2009, 09:01:17 AM
Thank you  :-wave And after two hour of work almost nothing could be noted outside...
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Letipapa on October 07, 2009, 12:28:13 PM
But it is emerging! :-wave
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on October 08, 2009, 10:15:41 AM
Mo' work today ;)
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on October 10, 2009, 09:46:11 AM
Start with shadows...
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Letipapa on October 15, 2009, 05:45:45 PM
Big machine - lot of job. :-obey :-wave
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: santynus on October 16, 2009, 10:18:03 AM
another great subjct No.1  :-ok :-clap the B29 have a lot of great and beauty nose art...  ;) :-wave
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: mfg495 on October 17, 2009, 04:44:36 PM
Looking forward to this profile

The Royal Air Force signed a formal agreement with the USA on the 27th January 1950 for the loaned of seventy B-29 bombers with the serial numbers:

WF434-WF448
WF490-WF-514
WF545-WF574

Later another 18 were delivered under serials WW342-WW356 and WZ966-WZ968.
The RAF called the aircraft the Boeing Washington B.1, they joined RAF Bomber Command in 1950 as a longer-range nuclear-capable bomber, they were to be a stopgap until the introduction of the EE Canberra.

The first 4 aircraft went to the Washington Conversion Unit based at RAF Marham on March 22nd, 1950. The first Squadron to see service with the Washington was No. 115 Squadron
After the Canberra bomber started to enter RAF service most of the Washingtons had been returned, although one or two, I cannot find true records for this, remained in the UK as gunnery targets.

In 1951 two RAF Washingtons took part in the SAC bombing competition compeating against USAF B-29s, results of the competition are unknown to me  ;)

Royal Air Force Squadrons equipped with the Washington were:
Based at RAF Marham -  Nos. 35, 90, 115 & 207
Based at RAF Coningsby - Nos. 15, 44, 57 & 149, later 57 Sqn moved to RAF Waddington in April 52
And RAF Watton had 192 Squadron that operated the aircraft from April 1952 to February 1958

Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on October 17, 2009, 05:18:29 PM
Nice catch! Maybe this will be the subject of the first profile :))
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on November 19, 2009, 11:21:34 AM
Progress work...
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Letipapa on November 24, 2009, 12:59:22 PM
Go on buddy!  :-clap :-clap :-clap :-ok
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on May 27, 2010, 07:30:33 PM
Maybe the moment to update this file...
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on May 27, 2010, 07:33:04 PM
More images with good close ups :)
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 02, 2010, 12:16:10 PM
Today's progress  :-wave
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Letipapa on June 02, 2010, 12:54:44 PM
It is emerging more now! ;) :-wave
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 02, 2010, 02:14:20 PM
More progress with some important close ups, there is variation in the construction of this machine.
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 02, 2010, 09:30:16 PM
Development complete  :-tri
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 03, 2010, 11:24:45 AM
Werewolf  :-clap
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Nico Braas on June 03, 2010, 03:10:51 PM
Assume you'll also do 'Enola Gay' and 'Boxcar'?
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 03, 2010, 03:28:06 PM
Not sure right now, but some later it is possible. But if you would like to see this machines- why not :-ok
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Second Air Force on June 03, 2010, 07:37:04 PM
No.1,

I've been in touch with a young man (on WIX) over the years whose grandfather was lost when Werewolf was shot down on her last mission. Several of us helped him to find the hardstand where A Square 28 parked on Isely Field, Saipan. I will try to find him and steer him here so he can view your art. He'll be very happy to see it, I think.

Scott
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 03, 2010, 08:05:49 PM
Well my friend... it is possible the he is one who have order this ;)
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Second Air Force on June 03, 2010, 08:38:20 PM
Ahah!

Would his WIX screen name start with a famous US patrol boat? :)

Scott
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 03, 2010, 09:02:31 PM
I do think so :)) His uncle flew and lost life in this machine...
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Second Air Force on June 04, 2010, 07:40:16 AM
Yes, it was his uncle, not grandfather. I'd forgotten--it seems the memory is one of the first things to go! :-wise

I've got enough B-29 subjects to keep you going for a long time on this thread! One of my research projects over the years has been the B-29 training program in Nebraska and Kansas. Trainers aren't as "sexy" as combat airplanes to most folks, but I've always found them very interesting. I'll have to get you a few images to study when I find the time.

Scott
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 04, 2010, 07:50:20 AM
This will be really nice- I hardly wait to see your project :-clap
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: Second Air Force on June 04, 2010, 04:44:05 PM
I'll have to get my B-29 material dug out of storage. When I do I'll put up a few photos of some trainers. :-jump

One observation on your side view--notice that a good number of Superfort ground crew removed the louvered panels over the turbochargers, both in the U.S. and the combat zone. It isn't consistent, but something that is quite noticeable.

Great stuff!
Scott
Title: Re: Boeing B-29
Post by: No.1 on June 04, 2010, 05:35:51 PM
You are right! Sometimes only rear section of the supercharger cover was removed and sometime whole panels. I did not have this detail and I left is as in fabric delivery. Another point- I hear that in missions over Japan, armament from turrets was removed in attempt to achieve top flight height...

:-wave