Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mfg495

Pages: 1 ... 54 55 [56] 57 58 ... 110
826
Warplane Art / Re: Boeing B-17 but which one??
« on: March 25, 2008, 06:09:39 PM »
Right back to B-17's. I have never heard of this variant before.

The YB-40 was the bomber escort variant of the Flying Fortress, where the Y stood for "service test". This aircraft was produced in an attempt to provide better defenses for B-17 daylight bomber forces which were suffering appalling losses in their raids against German targets on the European continent. The YB-40 was produced by converting existing B-17Fs in an attempt to provide additional firepower for the defense of bomber formations when they ventured into areas beyond the range of contemporary fighters.

The first XB-40 prototype was produced in November of 1942 by the Vega division of Lockheed. They converted a standard Boeing-built B-17F (serial number 41-24341) to escort configuration by adding a dorsal turret in the radio compartment position carrying a pair of 0.50-cal machine guns, a chin turret underneath the nose equipped with a pair of 0.50 cal machine guns, and twin gun mounts instead of the usual single gun mounts at each waist position. The regular top, belly, and tail turrets were retained, bringing total defensive armament to fourteen 0.50-inch machine guns. Additional protective armor was fitted for better crew protection. The bomb bays were replaced by storage areas which carried additional ammunition for the guns. The normal ammunition load was 11,135 rounds, which could be increased to 17,265 rounds if the fuel load was reduced.

Twenty more Vega-built B-17Fs were converted to YB-40 configuration, plus four TB-40 trainers. Although they bore the Vega model number of V-139-3, they were actually modified by Douglas at Tulsa, Oklahoma from Vega-built B-17F airframes. A variety of different armament configurations was tried. Some YB-40s were fitted with four-gun nose and tail turrets. Some carried cannon of up to 40-mm in calibre, and a few carried up to as many as 30 guns of various calibers in multiple hand-held positions in the waist as well as in additional power turrets above and below the fuselage! Oddly enough, there don't seem to have been any photographs ever published of these 30-gun YB-40s (insofar as I am aware), although I have seen some drawings.

The first operational YB-40 sortie took place on May 29, 1943 against St. Nazaire. Eight other missions were later flown, the last one taking place on July 4, 1943. Five kills and two probables were claimed during these missions, with the loss of one YB-40.

Very early on, it was found that the net effect of the additional drag of the turrets and the extra weight of the guns, armor, and additional ammunition was to reduce the speed of the YB-40 to a point where it could not maintain formation with the standard B-17s on the way home from the target once they had released their bombs.

The YB-40 could protect itself fairly well, but not the bombers it was supposed to defend. Consequently, it was recognized that the YB-40 project was an operational failure, and the surviving YB-40s were converted back to standard B-17F configuration or used as gunnery trainers back in the States. However, the YB-40 was to have one lasting impact--the chin turret originally introduced on the YB-40 was later adopted as standard for the B-17G series.




827
Combat Warplanes / Re: Aircraft photos
« on: March 24, 2008, 07:43:26 PM »
Some very interesting images, some in HiRes.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hawk914/sets/72157600266375167/

828
Warplane Art / Re: Boeing B-17 but which one??
« on: March 24, 2008, 07:06:07 PM »
Thank you all for your comments (Mother now gone home  :-ok)

829
Warplane Art / Re: Boeing B-17 but which one??
« on: March 24, 2008, 01:32:34 PM »
Thanks mate,

Well I'm going off-line for maybe the rest of the day, my mother has turned up for the day.  :))

See you all later  :-green

830
Warplane Art / Re: Boeing B-17 but which one??
« on: March 24, 2008, 12:39:21 PM »
He was Sergeant John Atkinson of 149 Squadron and was a Flight Engineer on board a Short Stirling Mk III.

The aircraft code OJ-O BK799 and took off from RAF Lakenheath at 23.51 on a raid to Krefeld, and was shot down by Oblt Ernst-Georg Drunkler of 12 /NJG 1 on the night of 22 June ‘43, timed at 02.39. This was his 3rd victory, and he went on to score 47 confirmed kills. Two of these were B17's in daylight. He was a holder of the Knights' Cross, and survived the war to die in 1970.

Other crew members were:

Pilot Off J Lowrie 148179
Flying Off DH Lyne 125540
Sgt EG Hird
Sgt A Coull 1559064
Sgt J Atkinson 1017417
Sgt DC Fudge 1312340
Sgt EC Waite 1279016

All the crew members died and are buried in northern Holland. The average age of the crew was 21

I have posted copies of his log book here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24921073@N05/
If anyone wishes to see hiRes copies please let me know

831
Combat Warplanes / Re: NATO attack 1999
« on: March 24, 2008, 09:52:31 AM »
I was serving overseas (hotter weather) during this period and we received very little information of what was going on. We were working hard with the problems we had.
I have found this site that lists what happen over this period for members who wish to research about the attacks.

http://www.beograd.org.yu/cms/view.php?id=201271

832
Warplane Art / Re: Boeing B-17 but which one??
« on: March 24, 2008, 09:47:53 AM »
The losses of RAF Bomber Command during WW2 is a thing close to my heart, my wife lost her grandfather on one raid. The RAF lost over 55,000 aircrew from BC. I think I have stated before, the total numbers in the RAF now is only 41,000.
Personal feelings, any lost of life is sad, it does not matter which side they may have been fighting for.

833
Warplane Art / Re: Boeing B-17 but which one??
« on: March 23, 2008, 07:31:37 PM »
Very nice  :-ok

Here's one from my collection of original prints. It was taken on the 26th Mar 1945.
I'm still researching the unit that took it.  :-think

834
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Benson Photo-Reconnaissance Wing
« on: March 22, 2008, 10:47:11 PM »
The  PR Mk IX  first started to appear in November 1942, this version was a slight improvement on the previous mark. But they were only a stop-gap for PR Mk XI. In total only 15 PR IXs converted from the fighter Mk IX versions at RAF Benson. They had their guns removed and cameras installed in the wings and for long-range missions, they had to have a 'slipper' tank added under the fuselage, as they were not fitted with internal wing fuel tanks.

Good luck with the model  :-ok

835
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Benson Photo-Reconnaissance Wing
« on: March 22, 2008, 08:37:15 PM »
I've started a PR.XI, I must get around to completing it  :-/

Are you going to have a Pink Spit or a Blue one  :-think

836
Warplane Art / Re: Bf109G
« on: March 21, 2008, 01:09:10 PM »
Off course but it is much cropped and painted over. The same like on the illustrating where we paint over drawings as base.

Great skill my friend  :-ok

837
Warplane Art / Re: Bf109G
« on: March 21, 2008, 12:59:47 PM »
Situation with cockpit on top side is as follows....

Is that a photograph you have used  :-think

838
Combat Warplanes / Re: P-51 picture
« on: March 21, 2008, 09:16:31 AM »

839
Combat Warplanes / Re: P-51 picture
« on: March 21, 2008, 12:11:13 AM »
Sorry Wingman81  :-obey

840
Combat Warplanes / Re: P-51 picture
« on: March 20, 2008, 11:29:54 PM »
P-51D's from the 359th Fighter Squadron, 356th Fighter Group, USAAF.

Air Forced Assigned To:

8th USAAF Air Force (Aug '43 - end WWII)
        
Stations Flown From:
Goxhill, England (Aug '43 - Oct '43)
Martlesham, England (Oct '43 - End WWII)
        
Campaigns Flown in:    
Air Offensive, Europe
Normandy
Northern France
Rhineland
Ardennes-Alsace
Central Europe

Source - http://www.web-birds.com/8th/356/356th.htm
            http://www.littlefriends.co.uk/356thfg.php

Pages: 1 ... 54 55 [56] 57 58 ... 110