Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mfg495

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 110
406
Warplane Art / Re: PRU Spitfires
« on: November 20, 2009, 09:29:58 AM »
Now a Blue PR.XI, I think the same aircraft  :-think



Another one of PL965, this time in the colours of the USAAF 14th Photo Sqn.
PL965 never flow with the USAAF during WW2.


407
Warplane Art / Re: PRU Spitfires
« on: November 20, 2009, 09:21:49 AM »
Pink Spitfire PR.XI


408
Warplane Art / Re: PRU Spitfires
« on: November 19, 2009, 06:13:18 PM »
 :-ok :-ok :-ok :-ok :-clap

409
Warplane Art / Re: Last Merlin Spitfires
« on: November 19, 2009, 08:47:24 AM »
The only pink ones I know of were the PR.XI's and the FR.IX's of 16 Sqn RAF. It is my understanding that in the later wars of the war this was the only squadron to operate with "Pink" Spitfires.
The FR.IX was a standard Mk.IX fighter with a F.24 port facing oblique camera fitted.

410
Warplane Art / Re: Crusader III
« on: November 19, 2009, 08:42:58 AM »
The XF8U-3 first flew on 2 June 1958. During testing, the aircraft reached Mach 2.6 at 35,000 ft (10,670 m). Vought projected a top speed of Mach 2.9, though the windscreen and most aluminum airframes were not designed to withstand the heat of such speeds.

In December 1955, the US Navy declared a competition for a Mach 2+ fleet defense interceptor. Fly-offs against the Crusader III's main competitor, the future F-4 Phantom II, demonstrated that the Vought design had a definite advantage in maneuverability. However, the solitary pilot in the XF8U-3 was easily overwhelmed with the workload required to fly the intercept and fire Sparrows which required constant radar illumination from the firing aircraft, while the Phantom II had a dedicated radar intercept officer on-board.

In addition, with the perception that the age of the guns was over, the Phantom's considerably larger payload and the ability to perform air-to-ground as well as air-to-air missions, trumped Vought's fast but single-purposed fighter. For similar reasons, the Phantom would replace the Navy's F-8 Crusader as the primary daylight air superiority fighter in the Vietnam conflict, although it was originally introduced as a missile-armed interceptor to complement day fighters like the Crusader.

The F8U-3 program was canceled with five aircraft built. Three aircraft flew during the test program, and were transferred to NASA for atmospheric testing, as the Crusader III was capable of flying above 95% of the Earth's atmosphere. NASA pilots flying at NAS Patuxent River routinely intercepted and defeated U.S. Navy Phantom IIs in mock dogfights, until complaints from the Navy put an end to the harassment.[1]

All of the Crusader IIIs were later scrapped.

Text - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XF8U-3_Crusader_III

411
Aircraft Modeling / Re: IPMS Telford 2009
« on: November 14, 2009, 01:23:56 PM »
Sad to say I missed it due to being on duty. For me it's only about one hour drive from my house  :(

413
Warplane Art / Re: PRU Spitfires
« on: November 10, 2009, 09:41:47 AM »
And of course, some useful information maybe found on my site  :-red

http://www.airrecce.co.uk/WW2/recce_ac/RAFAR.html

414
Warplane Art / Re: PRU Spitfires
« on: November 09, 2009, 09:27:36 PM »
Have a look here, I posted this sometime ago about Photo Reconaissance Spitfires.

http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum/borbene-letelice-combat-warplanes/photo-reconnaissance-spitfire-part-1-type-a-to-f/

415
Warplane Art / Re: PRU Spitfires
« on: November 08, 2009, 01:23:50 AM »
Hope more will to come :)
I'm sorting out the images for you as we speak............

416
Warplane Art / Re: PRU Spitfires
« on: November 08, 2009, 12:08:41 AM »
What an excellent subject No.1, thank you for your help  :-salut

417
Combat Warplanes / Re: Tornado
« on: November 06, 2009, 06:39:07 PM »
Yes- GR.1A, it have some changes over original GR.1 like the in flight refueling probe and laser target designator.

The GR.1A was the reconnaissance variant of the Tornado. In had mounted the TIRRS (Tornado Infra-Red Reconnaissance System), one on each side of the fuselage and a single IRLS (Infra-Red LineScan) reconnaissance sensor mounted on the underside of the fuselage.


418
Combat Warplanes / Re: Tornado
« on: November 05, 2009, 09:44:56 PM »
Great drawings No.1 GR.1?

419
Combat Warplanes / Re: Harrier II
« on: November 05, 2009, 09:43:49 PM »
 :-ok :-ok

420
Combat Warplanes / Re: Tornado
« on: November 03, 2009, 05:51:26 PM »
No need as well I have some material and this will be so quick work... short deadlines :(

No problem my friend

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 110