20251
Forums Works / Re: I better say hello
« on: November 12, 2006, 04:45:50 PM »
Thank you Iljusin- try to say this on English as welll most users are not Serbians 
News:
Forum is closed for new members. All content is private and can not be shared
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
20252
Combat Warplanes / Armor test
« on: November 12, 2006, 01:08:19 PM »
One image of the Mi-28 and its armor performaces 
20253
Warplane Art / Re: Defiant Britain
« on: November 12, 2006, 11:53:53 AM »
As I know Defiant have its own philosophy of fight. That was "turret fighter" and idea was that he is capable to fire in more direction then the stndard fighter. But in service that was not as easy as was on the drawing boards.
20254
Aircraft Modeling / Re: Great news about Airfix
« on: November 12, 2006, 08:51:47 AM »
I have this kit much before and it look the same as the image of the Canberra from your unit.
20255
Aircraft Modeling / Re: Great news about Airfix
« on: November 12, 2006, 08:20:47 AM »
That right PV- still the Humbrol is the best enamel for me... also Revell 
20256
Aircraft Modeling / Re: Great news about Airfix
« on: November 11, 2006, 11:02:28 PM »
Yes it is too much- but there is cheap option of the Frog/Novo kit...
20257
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Low Flying
« on: November 11, 2006, 10:59:57 PM »
As I have read since WW2 RAF pilots [as well FAA] are the very best trained.
20258
Aircraft Modeling / Re: Great news about Airfix
« on: November 11, 2006, 05:51:58 PM »
You still did not get Canberra in 1/48?!?
20259
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Low Flying
« on: November 11, 2006, 05:21:02 PM »
What a great feeling for the pilots!!!
20260
Warplane Art / Re: Defiant Britain
« on: November 11, 2006, 02:48:53 PM »
... and more safe to the crew!!! Gunner was no chance to escape from the gun turret 
20261
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Photo Recce Canberra's
« on: November 11, 2006, 11:34:28 AM »
I have just see and it is very nice and useful link. Graphic is good and data much better!!! Gretting friend !
20262
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Photo Recce Canberra's
« on: November 11, 2006, 11:32:50 AM »
Just go ahead mfg- your post here is much apreciated 
20263
Warplane Art / Re: Defiant Britain
« on: November 11, 2006, 09:23:17 AM »
And I have to say that this is the best art I have ever seen by this gentlemen - Night Fighter!!! Grettings!!! Thank you mfg for additional info and nice image
20264
Combat Warplanes / Re: Double bail out
« on: November 09, 2006, 08:06:11 PM »
Birds- what a lovely living creature... but can make damage with no intention. I remember when I watched long
time ago test made in the UK. They have used thrush birds and put it inside tunnel. They have quick relase
inside and then hit is with aircraft glass plate of 700 km/h speed. Very sadly as well a lot of this nice small
birds is killed in this testing but many of the data was reached about the possible material protection. Most
problem present the same engine duct. There could be placed grid but this make disturnate air stream and
have penalty on the engine performance.
time ago test made in the UK. They have used thrush birds and put it inside tunnel. They have quick relase
inside and then hit is with aircraft glass plate of 700 km/h speed. Very sadly as well a lot of this nice small
birds is killed in this testing but many of the data was reached about the possible material protection. Most
problem present the same engine duct. There could be placed grid but this make disturnate air stream and
have penalty on the engine performance.
20265
Warplane Art / Re: Rüstsätz interception
« on: November 09, 2006, 09:59:26 AM »
If he could ask before maybe some sharper details could be made. Images like this could help 