Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mfg495

Pages: 1 ... 97 98 [99] 100 101 ... 110
1471
I'm lost for words, bar one, EXCELLENT  :-obey :-obey

1472
Warplane Art / Re: Speed road to Photoshop
« on: January 29, 2007, 01:26:48 PM »
great infomation No.1, I have used this on some of my images on my site.  :-ok

1473
Warplane Art / Re: one new project...
« on: January 27, 2007, 02:32:24 PM »
Truly excellent, I only wish I had the skill  :-obey :-obey

1474
Combat Warplanes / Re: Your favorite airplane
« on: January 27, 2007, 02:04:16 PM »
Great aircraft No.1

I think by now that you all know that I have a great love for the Canberra PR9. But there is also another aircraft in my life, that is the Supermarine Spitfire PRXIX.

The last and the greatest photographic reconnaissance variant of the PR Spitfires

It was powered by the Griffon 66 engine, with a max ceiling of 42,000ft. Its normal safe range was 1,160 miles, but this was extended to 1,550 miles by adding a 170 gallon overloaded drop-tank.

She could have a number of camera fits, listed below are the common ones:

1. Split pair of vertical F24 cameras with 14in or 20in lenses, one oblique F24 camera, fitted with either 8in or 14in lenses

2. Spilt pair of vertical F8 or F52 20in lens cameras.

3. Spit pair of vertical F52 36in lens camera

Some 225 models came off the assembly lines with production ending early 1946, but the aircraft was used in front-line photo reconnaissance service with the RAF until April 1954.

In fact the last time a Spitfire PRXIX was used to perform an operation act was in 1963 when one was used in battle trials against an English Electric Lightning to determine if a RAF Lightning could take on a piston engined aircraft.
This information was required because the RAF jets might have to engage P-51 Mustangs in the Indonesian conflict of the time.

1475
Warplane Art / Re: one new project...
« on: January 27, 2007, 12:58:24 AM »
I'm sick at home...

Get well soon............ :-red

1476
Warplane Art / Re: one new project...
« on: January 26, 2007, 02:05:22 PM »
Looking good.

Have a look at this Typhoon

1477
Warplane Art / Re: Back to the roots
« on: January 24, 2007, 01:09:39 PM »
excellent backdrop  :-ok

1478
Combat Warplanes / Re: New USS Carrier Gerald R. Ford
« on: January 22, 2007, 12:53:08 PM »
The Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers (or Ford-class) will be the next generation supercarrier for the United States Navy. Before its redesignation as the Ford-class, this new class of carriers was known as the CVNX carrier program and then as the CVN-21 carrier program. It should not be confused with CV 21, the hull designation for the post-World War II carrier USS Boxer, which was in service from 1945-1969.


1479
Combat Warplanes / Re: De Havilland Vampire
« on: January 21, 2007, 05:24:10 PM »
Excellent shot, I've just purcahse a photo of a Canberra PR3, it was taken the day after I joined the RAF, over 30 years ago.
I will post it soon.

1480
Warplane Art / Re: XP-46
« on: January 21, 2007, 02:28:20 PM »
Great job No.1.  :-ok
How long does it take you to produce an image like the one you have posted.  :-think

1481
Combat Warplanes / Re: Desert Tornado
« on: January 19, 2007, 09:13:24 PM »
Here's two Gulf War 1 art work on Tornados

1482
Combat Warplanes / Re: Ryan VTOL
« on: January 19, 2007, 11:31:12 AM »
Found this link about the Ryan XV-5B ("fan-in-wing" VTOL research aircraft)

http://history.nasa.gov/SP-3300/ch8.htm#61

Here is a link to a kit and more infomation on the aircraft

http://www.fantastic-plastic.com/RyanXV-5VertifanPage.htm

1483
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Marham Tornado Wing
« on: January 16, 2007, 03:21:49 PM »
Looking forward to your images iljushin, I'm sorry but as of yet I do not have the skills.  :-wall  :-help I also will be following No.1's lessons.

If you require any images of Tornados or another RAF aircraft, please let me know.  :-ok

1484
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Marham Tornado Wing
« on: January 16, 2007, 02:23:14 PM »
No two aircraft have the same call signs, so I would say that they are the same aircraft, your image of course is minus squadron markings.

1485
Combat Warplanes / Re: RAF Marham Tornado Wing
« on: January 16, 2007, 11:09:56 AM »
Oh,ok...thank you!  :-wave Just one more thing...are my eyes good?Is it a plane who's nose pointing at the Queen's R/R ,or I'm wrong again...  :-red

I think you are right, the 617 aircraft is the one with red flash on the tail.

and of course in the center, the PR9 Canberra's


Pages: 1 ... 97 98 [99] 100 101 ... 110