Fokker S-14 Machtrainer
There is still some confusion on the Brazilian S-14. Although it is stated by many sources that ‘none were actually built and flown in Brazil’, this may not be true. In a recent article in the Dutch KLu magazine ‘De Vliegende Hollander’ a former technical officer, Arend Kraag, claimed there was a Brazilian S-14. He literally stated: ‘I was with my brother in Brazil a number of years ago and on an airfield somebody showed me a picture of an S-14 on a flightline in colours of the Brazilian air force with yellow or orange surfaces. I couldn’t believe my eyes!’ Although, this is definitely not a first-hand account, there might be some truth in this story and it could be possible that at least one and maybe even more S-14′s were actually assembled and flown from the parts shipped from the Netherlands!
A second life for the S-14 prototype…
Museum pieces…
L-11 is now on display in the Militaire Luchtmacht Museum MLM at Soesterberg.
L-17 was preserved to be shown on KLu Open Days. At present it is under complete restoration at Gilze Rijen airbase.
L-18 was used for many years as a gate guard at the Fokker works at Ypenburg until the base and works were closed. It was unfortunately scrapped in 1994.
All other S-14′s were scrapped, although some parts may still exist in various technical collections.
Tips for the model builders:
Technical characteristics of the S-14:
R.R. Derwent version R.R. Nene version
Power plant: Rolls-Royce Derwent VIII Rolls-Royce Nene 3 of
of 1575 kg thrust 2315 kg thrust
Dimensions:
-length 13.3 m 13.3 m
-wingspan 12.0 m 12.0 m
-height 4.7 m 4.7 m
-wing surface 31.8 m2 31.8 m2
Weights:
-empty 3765 kg 3970 kg (4043 kg with increased fuel capacity)
-all up 5350 kg 5550 kg ( 5890 kg with increased fuel capacity)
Performances:
-max. speed 730 km/h at 6000m 862 km/h at 3000 m
-service ceiling 11,200 m 12,900 m
-range max. 965 km max. 910 km (1140 km with increased fuel capacity)
(Source: Fokker S-14 brochure of December 1954)
Fokker S-14 armament:
The S-14 prototype K-1 with R.R. Nene engine was presented in company brochures with the possibility to use it as an armed version with a belly gun-pack with two 20 mm cannons with 180 rounds each. The final gun-pack had three fixing points and a locking device. After unlocking it could be lowered on four steel cables using a hand-crank. K-1 actually flew with a wooden gun-pack mock-up attached to its belly, although this did not have the same attachment points as the final gun-pack that was planned for the operational version.
Based on Fokker documents present at the Militaire Luchtvaart Museum at Soesterberg and the Aviodrome Museum at Lelystad, we may conclude that on the S-14′s operational at the KLu the provisions for mounting the gun-packs were never fitted. Except for the hoisting cables, locking device and attachment points, other internal equipment for the gun-pack included a nose-mounted gun camera and two gyroscopic gun-sights. Also these were never fitted in the KLu S-14′s. From other Fokker documents, it is clear the development of the gun-pack was terminated at a moment the prototype gun-pack was still under construction. The KLu had initially ordered 20 gun-packs for the S-14, but in fact only the unfinished prototype was actually built and supplied, although it was never used. The hardpoints under the wings for possible attachment of rockets were also never fitted on the KLu S-14′s or on the K-1 ‘Nene’ demonstrator.
Nico Braas
Literature:
Hugo Hooftman, Van Brik tot Starfighter Part 2. In de schietstoel, La Rivière & Voorhoeve – the Netherlands (1962)
Arno Marchand, ‘De Plank’ , De Vliegende Hollander, Jan. 2007, 10-11
Wim Schoenmaker, De Fokker S-14 Machtrainer, Maandblad Luchtvaart No. 6 (June 1988), 182-187
Lt. Col. C. Sipkes et al., Ervaringen van de Koninklijke Luchtmacht met de Fokker-vliegtuigen S-11 en S-14, Report Koninklijke Luchtmacht 20 November 1958
With special thanks to Flash Aviation, Eindhoven
All images from author collection. This article is extract from the large material and book in preparation by the author and the Let let Let team.
Related posts:




[...] when my very good friend Nico Braas from Netherland said that there could be interest to make article about this airplane for our web site LetLetLet Warplanes. I agree that this could be interesting [...]
I have just read the brief but very interesting article about the Fokker S.14 and its history.
As a Brazilian aviation historian, my interest on the Fokker S.14 stems from the role it played in the 7 August 1953 agreement signed by the Brazilian Air Ministry and Fokker’s Brazilian subsidiary – Fokker Indústria Aeronáutica S/A.
Yet it was with some surprise to note that there is still a persistent notion that a given number of these jet trainers were assembled and flown in Brazil. There is considerable circumstantial evidence pointing towards the delivery of S.14 components and sub-assemblies to Fokker Indústria Aeronáutica S/A and earmarked for the assembly of the first five S.14s for the Brazilian AF. Yet there is no evidence that a single airframe was ever assembled from these components. Indeed, barring personnel that performed flight evaluation work in the Netherlands in May of 1952, no Brazilian AF flight personnel ever flew the S.14.
Over the years this version has apparently gained credence in view of a single photograph portraying a Fokker S.14 in Brazilian AF markings.Although I have never had personal access to the photograph, a handful of retired Brazilian AF officers and aviation buffs have stated that they have seen such a photograph in a local general interest publication of the period.
It would seem reasonable that a Fokker S.14 did indeed receive Brazilian AF markings for publicity purposes – albeit in the Netherlands.
It should be mentioned that sometime between 1953 and his death in the United States, Gerben Sonderman performed a number of displays with a Fokker S.11 – possibly airframe c/n 6628, which remained in Brazil. It has been repeatedly speculated that Sonderman performed a series of flight displays with a Fokker S.14 in Rio de Janeiro, but there is no proof that this actually occurred.
Best regards
Jackson Flores Jr.